Compulsory Wills for Heirs of Different Religions Perspective of  Istihsan

Ashlih Muhammad Dafizki Dafizki; Saiful  Amin; Faizin Faizin

doi:10.30983/gic.v2i1.423

Authors

Ashlih Muhammad Dafizki State Islamic University Sjech M. Djamil Djambek, Bukittinggi, Indonesia
Saiful Amin State Islamic University Sjech M. Djamil Djambek, Bukittinggi, Indonesia
Faizin Kerinci State Islamic Institute, Kerinci, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v2i1.423

Keywords:

Istihsan, Heirs of Different Religions, Compulsary Wills

Abstract

The issuance of mandatory wills to heirs of different religions is a form of legal innovation by the Supreme Court, yet the legal innovation by the Supreme Court constitutes a contradictory decision in Islamic law. Based on this issue, this article aims to explore the controversy of mandatory wills for heirs of different religions from the perspective of istihsan. This research is conducted as a library research, employing the perspective of istihsan. The data sources in this research are divided into primary and secondary data. Primary data are extracted from the Directory of Supreme Court Decisions regarding mandatory wills. Secondary data consist of books, journals, and studies related to the topic. Consequently, the results of this study indicate that the mandatory wills granted by the Supreme Court to heirs of different religions, from the perspective of istihsan, fall within istihsan with necessity, prioritizing justice to achieve benefits for all parties involved in litigation

References

Achmad Jarchosi. (2020). Pelaksanaan Wasiat Wajibah. Adhki: Journal of Islamic Family Law. https://doi.org/10.37876/adhki.v2i1.34

Amalia Yunia Rahmawati. (2020). Wasiat Wajibah. July, 1–23.

Andayani, D., & Hariyati, T. (2020). Problematika Wasiat Wajibah Terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Di Indonesia. Cepalo, 4(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no2.1893

Arif, M. R. (2017). Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah Terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama (Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Antara Hukum Islam dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 368.K/AG/1995). DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 351–372.

Basri, R. (2019). Ushul Fikih 1. Nusantara Press.

Dafizki, A. M., Rosman, E., & Busyro, B. (2023). Tradisi Budendo Pelaku Nikah Sumbang Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum Islam. USRATY: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 1(2), 140–147.

Darmawati. (2019). Ushul Fiqh. Prenada Media Group.

Effendi, S. (2019). Ushul Fiqh (1st ed., Issue 7). Kencana Media Group.

Fitria, M. (2023). Operasi Plastik dan Selaput Dara (Antara Kebutuhan dan Keinginan) dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. USRATY: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 1(1), 12–22.

Gafur, A. (2022). Analisis Konsep Wasiat Wajibah dalam KHI dan Putusan MA. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v10i1.2483

Habibullah, E. S. (2016). Pandangan Imam Abu Hanifah Dan Imam Syafi’i Tentang Al-Istihsan. Al Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(7), 451–466.

Hanum, Z., & Syahr, A. (2016). Wasiat Wajibah Sebagai Wujud Penyelesaian Perkara Waris Beda Agama Dalam Perkembangan Sosial Masyarakat. Holistik, 1(2), 123.

Harisudin, M. N. (2021). Ilmu Ushul Fiqh (p. 92). Setara Press.

Hizbullah, S., Hanani, S., & Nofiardi, N. (2023). Delik Zina Controversy in the Kuhp. GIC Proceeding, 1, 356–362. https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.126

Humaira, A. (2016). Istihsan Dalam Proses Istinbat Hukum. Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta., 1–23.

Jalil, A. (2018). Pernikahan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v6i2.56

Jayusman, J., Efrinaldi, E., Shafra, S., Nasution, A. S., & Yarmunida, M. (2024). Mubadalah’s Perspective on Nusyuz in Islamic Law and Positive Law in Indonesia. RADEN INTAN: Proceedings on Family and Humanity, 1(1), 56–70.

Liza, A., Hanani, S., & Nofiardi, N. (2023). Reflection of Islamic Law on Living Al-Hijr When Baganyi in The Community Nagari Canduang Koto Laweh. GIC Proceeding, 1, 338–347. https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.134

Maimun. (2017). Pembagian Hak Waris Terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Melalui Wasiat Wajibah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kewarisan Islam. Asas: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah, 9(1), 1–14.

Marni, T. S., Hanani, S., & Nofiardi, N. (2023). Modernisation of Islamic Family Law in Indonesia (Analysis of Counter Legal Draft- Compilation of Islamic Law in Inheritance Law). GIC Proceeding, 1, 317–325. https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.131

Mutmainnah, I. (2020). Wasiat Wajibah dan Ahli Waris Beda Agama. 107.

Nugraheni, D. B., Ilhami, H., & Harahab, Y. (2012). Pengaturan dan Implementasi Wasiat Wajibah di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 22(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16229

Setiawan, E. (2017). Penerapan Wasiat Wajibah Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Dalam Kajian Normatif Yuridis. Muslim Heritage. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v2i1.1045

Siyoto, S. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Literasi Media.

Somantri, M. D., Dahwadin, & Faisal. (2018). Analisa Hukum Menunda Kehamilan Perkawinan Usia Dini Perspektif Istihsan Sebuah Upaya Membangun Keluarga Berkualitas. Mahkamah, 3(2), 212–213.

Sundari, E., Hanani, S., Nofiardi, N., & Gaffar, A. (2023). The Influence of the Development of Islamic Law on Waqf Institutions in Indonesia. GIC Proceeding, 1, 415–424.

Wahyudi, D., Hanani, S., & Nofiardi, N. (2023). Sociological Analysis of Islamic Law Regarding Law Number 22 of 2009 Related to the Sale and Purchase of Vehicles Without Complete Documents. GIC Proceeding, 1(22), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.113

Wandri, A., Arsal, A., Rahmiati, R., & Imran, M. (2023). Cryptocurrency As A Means of Investment and Payment on Islamic Law Perspective. Al Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 8(1), 30–43.

Zainab, & Sudirman. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Wasiat Wajibah Kepada Ahli Waris Non Muslim Dalam Hukum Waris di Indonesia. Maqasid, 7(1), 2615.

Zaman, M. (2018). Analisis Istihsan Atas Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Saksi Non Muslim Pada Perkara Perceraian. Al-Hukama’, 8(2), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2018.8.2.507-531