The Role of Islamic Management in Shaping Human Capital Development in Muslim Countries
Keywords:
Environmental strategies, Ethical responsibility, Implementation ethics, Sustainable business performanceAbstract
This study investigates the impact of implementation ethics and environmental strategies on sustainable business performance, with ethical responsibility acting as a mediating variable. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 312 managers of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results reveal that implementation ethics positively and significantly influences both environmental strategies and ethical responsibility, ultimately leading to enhanced sustainable business performance. Similarly, environmental strategies were found to exert a strong positive effect on ethical responsibility and directly contribute to sustainable business outcomes. The mediation analysis indicates that ethical responsibility partially mediates the relationship between implementation ethics, environmental strategies, and sustainable business performance, underscoring its critical role as a behavioral and cultural enabler. These findings contribute to the growing literature on ethical business practices and sustainability by empirically demonstrating that ethics-driven management approaches and proactive environmental strategies are crucial drivers of organizational success. Practical recommendations are provided for managers and policymakers to integrate ethical frameworks and green strategies into their business models to achieve long-term sustainability and competitive advantage.
References
Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., & Gabriel, K. P. (2020). Understanding employee responses to COVID-19: A behavioral corporate social responsibility perspective. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 18(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-06-2020-1053
Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A. A., & Vogel, D. (2020). The effects of mandatory environmental regulations on green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from OECD countries. Organization & Environment, 33(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619898802
Ardito, L., Raby, S., Albino, V., & Bertoldi, B. (2021). The duality of digitalization and sustainability: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121044
Bansal, P., & Song, H. C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095
Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2019). Strategic CSR for innovation in SMEs: Does diversity matter? Long Range Planning, 52(6), 101913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.07.005
Carroll, A. B. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR construct’s development and future. Business & Society, 60(6), 1258–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211001765
Dangelico, R. M., & Vocalelli, D. (2022). “Green marketing”: An analysis of definitions, dimensions, and stakeholders. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(2), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2930
Del Giudice, M., Scuotto, V., Garcia-Perez, A., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2020). Shifting wealth II in Chinese economy: The role of Chinese born global firms in developing innovation capabilities. International Business Review, 29(5), 101713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101713
Elkington, J. (2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line
Fernando, Y., & Wah, W. X. (2017). The impact of eco-innovation drivers on environmental performance: Empirical results from the green technology sector in Malaysia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 12, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.05.002
Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773750
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, J. M., & Ramírez-Solís, E. R. (2023). Ethical responsibility in the age of ESG: Emerging frameworks for business practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(4), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05196-7
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
Kolk, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2021). The state of research on Africa in business and management: Insights from a systematic review of key international journals. Business & Society, 60(6), 1361–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211012629
Lozano, R. (2022). Sustainable business models: Providing a more holistic perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1193–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2966
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 97(1), 66–77.
Sroufe, R. (2020). Integration and organizational change towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 123184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123184
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.5001
Zimon, D., & Madzík, P. (2020). Standardized management systems and risk management in the supply chain. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 37(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2019-0108
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamed Khamees Sarhan, Abdul Razak Munire, Sabbar Dahham Sabbar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




