The Modern Worldview and Islam's Perspective on Science

Penulis

  • Radtria Alkaf UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Syafwan Rozi UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • M. Arif M. Arif UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Ulva Rahmi UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Dilla Desvi Yolanda UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.130

Abstrak

This research aims to analyze the Western and Islamic perspectives on science. From a Western perspective, science is often viewed as the outcome of objective scientific methods and empirical research. This approach emphasizes the use of reason and logic in developing knowledge. On the other hand, the Islamic perspective acknowledges the importance of scientific methods in acquiring knowledge but also emphasizes the spiritual and revelatory dimensions in understanding reality. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of these perspectives, examining the similarities and differences in the conceptions of science from both viewpoints. Literature studies and religious references were utilized to gain a comprehensive understanding of these perspectives. The research reveals that while there are differences between the Western and Islamic views on science, there are also significant points of convergence. The analysis results show that the Western perspective tends to lean towards a materialistic and secular dimension in understanding science, while the Islamic perspective integrates spiritual aspects and revelation in the comprehension of scientific knowledge. However, both perspectives recognize the importance of using scientific methods to obtain objective and verifiable knowledge. Additionally, both emphasize the values of ethics and responsibility in the application of scientific knowledge. This research provides valuable insights into the differences and similarities in the Western and Islamic perspectives on science. Its findings can be utilized to enrich the dialogue between the two traditions and promote a more inclusive and holistic understanding of science in multicultural and multireligious societies.

Referensi

Al-Attas, Muhammad Naquib. 2011. Islam Dan Sekularisme. Bandung: PIMPIN.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. 2002. Pergolakan Pemikiran Di Bidang Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Ensiklopedi Tematis Dunia Islam. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Fazlur Rahman. 1992. “Islamisasi Ilmu Sebuah Respon.” Ulumul Qur’an1992 IV: 68–72.

Hasan Langgulung. 1995. Manusia Dan Pendidikan Suatu Analisa Psikologi Dan Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT.Al-Husna Zikro.

Hilmawati Hindersah. 2005. Krisis Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern; Menuju Metodologi Partisipatif. Bandung: Unisba.

J.D Bernald. 1969. Science in History, Volume 3 The Natural Sciences in Our Time. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

Kuntowijoyo. 2007. Islam Sebagai Ilmu. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

M Rasjidi. 1994. Filsafat Agama. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Maurice Bucaille, terj. 1998. Asal Usul Manusia Menurut Bibel, Al-Qur’an Dan Sains. Bandung: Mizan.

Milton K. Munitz. 1981. Space, Time and Creation. New York; Dover Publication.

Natshir Haedar. 1997. Agama Dan Krisis Kemanusiaan Modern. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Pervez Hoodbhoy. 1991. Islam and Science: Religious Orthodoxy and the Battle for Rationality. LOndon: Zed Books.

Rizal Muntasyir, Misnal Munir. 2013. Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sari, Milya, Asmendri. 2020. “Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) Dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.” 2020.

Seyyed Hossain Nasr. 1989. Knowledge and the Sacred. New York: Crossroad.

———. 1997. Sains Dan Peradaban Di Dalam Islam. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.

Syafi’ie. 2000. Konsep Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam AL-Qur’an. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Syekh M. Naquib al-Attas. 1978. Islam Dan Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ABIM.

Wahbah az-Zuhaili. 2002. Al-Qur’an Menjawab Tantangan Zaman. Jakarta: Mustaqim.

Diterbitkan

2023-07-31

Cara Mengutip

Alkaf, R., Rozi, S., M. Arif, M. A., Rahmi, U., & Desvi Yolanda, D. (2023). The Modern Worldview and Islam’s Perspective on Science. GIC Proceeding, 1(1), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.130