Analysis of Student Knowledge Test Results of Teacher Professional Education Study Program (PPG) Teacher Training Personnel Education Institution (LPTK) UIN Bukittinggi

Iswantir M; Zulfani Sesmiarni; Iltavia Iltavia; Zetty  Nurzuliana Rashed; Redha Septi Asih

Authors

Iswantir M Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M.Djamil Djambek Bukttinggi
Zulfani Sesmiarni Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M.Djamil Djambek Bukttinggi
Iltavia Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M.Djamil Djambek Bukttinggi
Zetty Nurzuliana Rashed University Islam Selangor (UIS) Selangor, Malaysia
Redha Septi Asih Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M.Djamil Djambek Bukttinggi

Keywords:

Teacher Professional Education, Knowledge Test, LPTK UIN Bukittinggi

Abstract

This research aims to measure the level of learning achievement of students in the Teacher Professional Program knowledge test for each subject in 2021 at LPTK UIN Bukittinggi (PPG). This research is a qualitative descriptive study. This research was conducted at the Professional Teacher Study Program (PPG) Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training LPTK UIN Bukittinggi. The subjects of this research were 75 PPG LPTK UIN Bukittinggi students who had not yet graduated from UP. Consideration of research subjects is based on the results of the 2021 UKMPPG Knowledge Test which is only held by each student who has not passed the Knowledge Test (UP) which is distributed to the LPTK. Of the 75 PPG participants who were declared not to have passed the Knowledge Test (UP) in 2021, we only collected 73 people in this study. Because the 2 people did not take the Knowledge Test (UP) because there was a natural disaster in their home environment and there was 1 person who did not want to continue PPG activities. Based on the results and discussion of the research, it can be concluded as follows, that first; PPG student knowledge test results in 2021 were lowest in CP 3 and highest in CP 1. Second; The lowest percentage of PPG participant scores in 2021 is in the very good criteria and the highest is in the fair criteria.

References

Agustang, A., Mutiara, I. A., & Asrifan, A. (2021). Masalah Pendidikan Di Indonesia. OSF Preprints, January, 0–19. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9xs4h

Fathudin, S., & Widodo, A. (n.d.). KOMPETENSI KOMPETENSI PROFESIONAL GURU.

Habibullah, A. (2012). KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU. Edukasi, 10(3).

Huda, M. (2018). Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru Dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa (Studi Korelasi Pada Mata Pelajaran Pai). Jurnal Penelitian, 11(2), 237–266. https://doi.org/10.21043/jupe.v11i2.3170

Irham, M. & N. ardy W. (2013). Psikologi Pendidikan. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Lingkungan, D. I., Ri, K. A., Pendidikan, D., Islam, T., Jenderal, D., & Islam, P. (2013). Panduan penyelenggaraan PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN PROFESI GURU (PPG) DALAM JABATAN DI LINGKUNGAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA RI D. 1–22.

Pemerintah, P. (2005). PERATURAN PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2005 TENTANG STANDAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 46(2),(Neurofibroma, schwannoma or a hybrid tumor of the peripheral nerve sheath), 113-116.

Putri Balqis, N. U., & Sakdiah Ibrahim. (2014). KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU DALAM MENINGKATKAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA PADA SMPN 3 INGIN JAYA KABUPATEN ACEH BESAR. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, 14(1), 25.

Rahmawati, A., & Nartani, C. I. (2018). Kompetensi Sosial Guru Dalam B Erkomunikasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Sd Negeri Rejowinangun 3 Kotagede Yogyakarta. Trihayu: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 4(3), 388–392.

Ratna Rosita Pangestika, & Alfarisa, F. (2015). PENDIDIKAN PROFESI GURU (PPG): STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN PROFESIONALITAS GURU DAN PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA Ratna Rosita Pangestika & Fitri Alfarisa. 1995, 671–683.

Ukmppg, P. (2022). Bedah kisi-kisi soal up dalam rangka pelaksanaan ukmppg 2022.

Zulfitri, H., Setiawati, N. P., & Ismaini. (2019). Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru. LINGUA, Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra, 19(2), 130–136.