Improving Student Learning Outcomes in PAI Learning by Using the Discussion Method at UPT SDN 14 Pelangai Kecil
Keywords:
Learning Outcomes, Discussion Metho, Islamic EducationAbstract
This study aims to improve student learning outcomes in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) by using the discussion method in class V SDN 14 Pelangai Kecil. The research was conducted in three cycles, with each cycle consisting of one meeting and an allocation of 2 x 35 minutes. The first cycle showed low learning outcomes, with only 25% of students reaching the Minimum Completion Criteria (KKM). The second cycle showed improvement, with 43% of students reaching the KKM. Based on the reflections and improvements made in cycle II, there was progress in students' understanding of the material taught, although some students still did not achieve the expected learning outcomes. In conclusion, the use of the discussion method can improve PAI learning outcomes in class V students, although further improvements in the teaching process are needed.
References
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. McGraw-Hill Education.
Daradjat, Z. (2008). Discussion Method. PT Rineka Cipta.
in SMP N 1 Dukuhturi, P. (n.d.). The Use of Discussion Method to Improve PAI Learning Outcomes.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gearlach, E., & Ely, D. P. (1980). Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach. Prentice Hall.
Hamid, H. (2017). Islamic Religious Education and Contextual Learning. Rajawali Press.
Hisyam Zaini, B., & Aryani, S. A. (2007). Discussion Method in Learning. Andi Offset.
Japendi. (2021). The Discussion Method Improves Student Learning Outcomes in Class IV of SDN Amertasari. Journal of Education.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory Action Research: A Guide for Researchers. Sage Publications.
Kunandar. (2007). Assessment of Learning Outcomes. Rajawali Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Mukhlis, I. (2000). Classroom Action Research. PT Rineka Cipta.
Nisa, A. W. C., Wijayati, R., & Muhammad, D. H. (2022). Efforts to Improve PAI Learning Outcomes Through Discussion Methods in Class X B Students of SMK Al-Falah Sumber Wetan Probolinggo City. Journal of Education and Counseling (JPDK), 4(1), 203–213.
Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education. Viking Press.
Sagala, S. (2010). Concept and Meaning of Learning. Alfabeta.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Teaching Media. Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Sugiarti, D. (1997). Kemmis and Taggart Classroom Action Research Model: Concept and Implementation. Journal of Education.
Sun, J. (2011). Exploring Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 41–59.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yuridal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
