Reflection of Islamic Law on Living Al-Hijr When Baganyi in The Community Nagari Canduang Koto Laweh

Authors

  • Awal Liza UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Silfia Hanani UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Nofiardi UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.134

Keywords:

Islamic law, Al-Hijr, Baganyi

Abstract

After marriage the husband will live in the wife's house (matrilocal) but must go through the bajapuik tradition first, this is the consequence when there is a conflict between husband and wife which is difficult to reconcile, the husband who leaves the residence. The departure of the husband from the wife's residence is known as baganyi. The Nagari Canduang Koto Laweh community considers baganyi to be a way of solving household problems such as when nusyuz is a wife. Baganyi is often equated with al-hijr which is permissible in Islam. The main problem in this article is how is the concept of baganyi that occurs in the Nagari Canduang Koto Laweh community, is it in line with the concept of al-hijr in Islam?, To what extent is Niniak mamak and traditional institutions involved in resolving baganyi cases?, and how effective is the baganyi in resolving household matters? In this study it was concluded that although the causes of the occurrence were almost the same, there were several differences in the practice of baganyi that occurred in the Canduang community and the concept of al-hijr which was permitted by Islam. Mamak has an important role in solving the baganyi problem, even involving his wife in this case, while the customary institution that used to act as a partner consulting body has now begun to lose its role since the KUA took over the task of marriage. Regarding the effectiveness of baganyi as a settlement of household cases it is considered less effective.

References

Ahmad, S. asy-Syaikh. (2004). Umdatu at-Tafsir an al-Haafidz Ibnu Katsir Mukhtasar tafsir Al-Qur’an al Adzim, Terj. Fathul Mudjib. ATuqqa.

Ahmad Izuddin. (2015). Praktik al-Hijr dalam Penyelesaian Nusyuz di Pengadilan Agama dalam Jurnal de Jure. Vol 7, No.2, 136–138.

al-Zuhaily, W. (2006). Al-Fiqh al-Islamy wa Adillatuh,Juz IX. Dar al-fikr.

al-Maraghi. (2005). Tafsir al-Maraghy, Jilid V. Musthafa al-Baby al-Halaby.

Amir MS. (2011). Adat Minangkabau Pola dan Tujuan Hidup Orang Minang. Citra Harta Prima.

Amir Syarifuddin. (2006). Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia: Antara Fiqh Munakahat dan Undang-undang Perkawinan. Kencana.

Ananda, A. R. C., Arafah, R. A., & Pangestu, R. (2020). Pembaruan Islam Dalam Bidang Keluarga Dan Relevansinya Dengan Proses Penyelesaian Nusyuz. Vol. 5, No. 2, 184–195.

Arifin, Z. (2013). Bundo Kanduang: (Hanya) Pemimpin di Rumah (Gadang). Antropologi Indonesia : Indonesian Journal of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 88–176.

as-Subki, A. Z. (2010). Fiqh Keluarga. Amzah.

Bandaro, N. L. Dt. (2002). Etnis dan Adat Minangkabau Permasalahan dan Masa Depannya. Angkasa.

Basyir, A. D. S. bin al A. bin I. bin. (t.t.). Sunan Abi Dawud. Maktaba al-Ishriyyah.

Djamaan, N. (2006). Fiqh Munakahat. Dimas Toha Putra Group.

Fatimah, S. (2012). Gender Dalam Komunitas Masyarakat Minangkabau; Teori, Praktek Dan Ruang Lingkup Kajian. Kafa`Ah: Journal Of Gender Studies, Vol. 2 No. 1.

Mahmud al-Mishry Abu ’Amar. (2006). Al-Zawaj al-Ismlamy al-Sa’id. Dar al-Shafa.

Nofiardi. (2018). Perkawinan dan Baganyi: Analisis Sosiologis Kulturaldalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan di Kecamatan Banuhampu Kabupaten Agam. Al-Ihkam, V o l . 1 3 N o . 1.

Sadarjoen. (2005). Konflik Marital, Pemahaman Konseptual, Actual dan Alternative Solusinya. Refika Aditama.

Yanasti, S., Jendrius Jendrius, & Maihasni Maihasn. (2021). Kamari Bedo: Dilema Perempuan dalam Ketidakpastian Status Pernikahan. Vol 4, No 1, 9–15.

Yuzendri. (2023, mei). Matrilokal dan Baganyi [Komunikasi pribadi].

Downloads

Published

31-07-2023

How to Cite

Liza, A. ., Hanani, silfia, & Nofiardi, N. (2023). Reflection of Islamic Law on Living Al-Hijr When Baganyi in The Community Nagari Canduang Koto Laweh. GIC Proceeding, 1(1), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.134

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>